References
- Dewald, William G., Jerry G. Thursby, and Richard G. Anderson. 1986. “Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.”
The American Economic Review 76(4): 587-603. [JSTOR]
- Robert, Gentleman. 2005. “Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study.” Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 4(1).
[Bepress]
- Gentleman, Robert, and Duncan Temple Lang. 2007. “Statistical Analyses and Reproducible Research.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 16(1): 1-23.
[Amstat]
- Jacobson, John W., James A. Mulick, and Allen A. Schwartz. 1995.
“A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and antiscience science working group on facilitated communication.” American Psychologist 50(9): 750-765.
- Stodden, Victoria, Friedrich Leisch, and Roger D. Peng. 2014. Implementing Reproducible Research. Boca Raton: Crc Pr Inc.
- Poppel, Frans van, and Lincoln H. Day. 1996. “A Test of Durkheim’s Theory of Suicide--Without Committing the ‘Ecological Fallacy’.”
American Sociological Review 61(3): 500-507. [JSTOR]
- Peterson, Richard R. 1996a. “A Re-Evaluation of the Economic Consequences of Divorce.” American Sociological Review 61(3): 528-536.
[JSTOR] and 1996b. “Statistical Errors, Faulty Conclusions, Misguided Policy: Reply to
Weitzman.” American Sociological Review 61(3): 539-540 [JSTOR] ;
Weitzman, Lenore J. 1996. “The Economic Consequences of Divorce Are Still Unequal: Comment on Peterson.” American Sociological Review 61(3): 537-538
[JSTOR]
- Magnus, Jan R., and Mary S. Morgan. 1999. Methodology and Tacit Knowledge: Two Experiments in Econometrics. Wiley.
- Special Issue of PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3), 1995 on replication
- Aberbach, Joel D., and Bert A. Rockman. 1995. ‘Engaging the Periphery. More Busywork for Political Scientists’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 476–478. [JSTOR]
- Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Katherine Tate. 1995. ‘Data Accessibility in Political Science: Putting the Principle into Practice’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 470–472. [JSTOR]
- Fowler, Linda L. 1995. ‘Replication as Regulation’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 478–481.
[JSTOR]
- Gibson, James L. 1995. ‘Cautious Reflections on a Data-Archiving Policy for Political Science’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 473–476.
[JSTOR]
- Golden, Miriam A. 1995. ‘Replication and Non-Quantitative Research’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 481–483.
[JSTOR]
- Hauck, Robert J-P. 1995. ‘Oh Monsieur Pasteur, We Hardly Knew You!’ PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 443–444.
[JSTOR]
- Herrnson, Paul S. 1995a. ‘Replication, Verification, Secondary Analysis, and Data Collection in Political Science’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 452–455.
[JSTOR]
- Herrnson, Paul S. 1995b. ‘Response: Potential Research Policies for Political Science’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 492–493.
[JSTOR]
- King, Gary. 1995a. ‘A Revised Proposal, Proposal’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 494–499.
[JSTOR]
- King, Gary. 1995b. ‘Replication, Replication’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 444–452.
[JSTOR]
- Lineberry, Robert L., and Nita A. Lineberry. 1995. ‘Our Brother’s Keeper: Authenticity, Accountability, and the Social Science Quarterly Project’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 484–487.
[JSTOR]
- Maisel, L. Sandy. 1995. ‘On the Inadequacy and Inappropriateness of the Replication Standard’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 467–470.
[JSTOR]
- Meier, Kenneth J. 1995. ‘Replication: A View from the Streets’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 456–459.
[JSTOR]
- Nagler, Jonathan. 1995. ‘Coding Style and Good Computing Practices’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 488–492.
[JSTOR]
- Peterson, M. J. 1995. ‘Community and Individual Stakes in the Collection, Analysis, and Availability of Data’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 462–464.
[JSTOR]
- Portis, Edward B., and Jon R. Bond. 1995. ‘Comment’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 461.
[JSTOR]
- Sniderman, Paul M. 1995b. ‘Evaluation Standards for a Slow-Moving Science’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 464–467.
[JSTOR]
- Stone, Walter J. 1995. ‘Reflection, Reflection: A Comment and Modest Proposal’. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(3): 459–460.
[JSTOR]
- The Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
Science 28 August 2015:
Vol. 349 no. 6251 . DOI: 10.1126/science.aac4716. [Article]
[Materials and Methods]
- John Bohannon. Many psychology papers fail replication test. Science 28 August 2015: 910-911. [article]
- B. A. Nosek (et al). Promoting an open research culture. Science 26 June 2015: 1422-1425. [article]
- Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005).
- “Why Most Published Research Findings are False,” PLoS Medicine, 2, e124. [article]
- Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2007), “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author’s Reply to Goodman and Greenland,” PLoS Medicine, 4, e125. [1] [article]
- Ioannidis, J. P. A.2014), “Discussion: Why ‘An Estimate of the Science-Wise False Discovery Rate and Application to the Top Medical Literature’ Is False,”, Biostatistics, 15, 28–36; discussion 39–45. [1] [article]Ioannidis, J. P. A.
- Gregory P. Samsa (2015) Has It Really Been Demonstrated That Most Genomic Research Findings Are False?, The American Statistician, 69:1, 1-4, DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2014.951127
- Monya Baker. Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test.
Largest replication study to date casts doubt on many published positive results.
Nature. 27 August 2015
- Raphael Silberzahn& Eric L. Uhlmann.
Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work
Nature. 07 October 2015
-
Robert MacCoun& Saul Perlmutter.Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth.
Nature 7 October 2015
- Regina Nuzzo. Scientific method: Statistical errors
P values, the 'gold standard' of statistical validity, are not as reliable as many scientists assume.
Nature, Vol 506, 7487, 12 February 2014
-
Erika Check Hayden. Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility.
One-quarter of studies that meet commonly used statistical cutoff may be false.
Nature 11 November 2013
-
Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (Eds.). (2017). The Practice of Reproducible Research: Case Studies and Lessons from the Data-Intensive Sciences. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
[E-book]
Websites
Replication Data
Science Watch